<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Obvipat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obvipat.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obvipat.com</link>
	<description>The blog for inventors, in-house counsel, &#38; entrepreneurs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:25:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Patents as Drivers for Invention: Why the America Invents Act is Improperly Named by Leonard Heyman</title>
		<link>http://www.obvipat.com/2011/12/patents-as-drivers-for-invention-why-the-america-invents-act-is-improperly-named/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Heyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obvipat.com/?p=1498#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>Regarding your Opinion piece in ACC, I have a few thoughts.  The first thing that came to mind is, yes, patents are intended to protect profits.  Patents were not intended to protect basic research performed by scientists studying far-off technologies such as fusion.  Given that we have yet to see a commercially feasible fusion reactor, I&#039;d say your physicist&#039;s senior management was quite correct in choosing not to patent their discovery in the 70s.  Even if they attempted such, it was probably not patentable anyway without being able to provide an enabling disclosure.  As a patent attorney, I&#039;m sure you understand this. 

It&#039;s hard to imagine how patents impact innovation and commerce since it requires imagining a world without patents.  However, Thomas Jefferson lived in such a world, and was in fact very skeptical of patents.  I currently work in the software industry, and many people in this field regard patents with a great deal of skepticism, which is reminiscent of what Thomas Jefferson said as an inventor, before taking on the role of the first patent examiner in the United States.  His statements opposing exclusive rights to intellectual property are well known and often quoted.  Example: http://movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/06/thomas-jefferson-on-patents-and-freedom-of-ideas/

But the truth is, after being in the role of the first examiner for some time, Thomas Jefferson reversed himself, and supported the patent system because he came to appreciate the power of the incentive to innovate brought by patents, stating patents  have &quot;given a spring to invention beyond his conception.&quot;  http://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/patents  

Something to think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your Opinion piece in ACC, I have a few thoughts.  The first thing that came to mind is, yes, patents are intended to protect profits.  Patents were not intended to protect basic research performed by scientists studying far-off technologies such as fusion.  Given that we have yet to see a commercially feasible fusion reactor, I&#8217;d say your physicist&#8217;s senior management was quite correct in choosing not to patent their discovery in the 70s.  Even if they attempted such, it was probably not patentable anyway without being able to provide an enabling disclosure.  As a patent attorney, I&#8217;m sure you understand this. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to imagine how patents impact innovation and commerce since it requires imagining a world without patents.  However, Thomas Jefferson lived in such a world, and was in fact very skeptical of patents.  I currently work in the software industry, and many people in this field regard patents with a great deal of skepticism, which is reminiscent of what Thomas Jefferson said as an inventor, before taking on the role of the first patent examiner in the United States.  His statements opposing exclusive rights to intellectual property are well known and often quoted.  Example: <a href="http://movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/06/thomas-jefferson-on-patents-and-freedom-of-ideas/" rel="nofollow">http://movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/06/thomas-jefferson-on-patents-and-freedom-of-ideas/</a></p>
<p>But the truth is, after being in the role of the first examiner for some time, Thomas Jefferson reversed himself, and supported the patent system because he came to appreciate the power of the incentive to innovate brought by patents, stating patents  have &#8220;given a spring to invention beyond his conception.&#8221;  <a href="http://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/patents" rel="nofollow">http://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/patents</a>  </p>
<p>Something to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Nortel Auction: Microsoft pays for Microsoft v. i4i by Web Hosting Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.obvipat.com/2011/07/the-nortel-auction-microsoft-pays-for-microsoft-v-i4i/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Hosting Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obvipat.com/?p=1427#comment-997</guid>
		<description>I really hope to be reading more of your posts and articles in the future, so I’ve bookmarked your blog. When I see good quality content, I like to share it with others. So I’ve created a backlink to your site. Thank you!…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope to be reading more of your posts and articles in the future, so I’ve bookmarked your blog. When I see good quality content, I like to share it with others. So I’ve created a backlink to your site. Thank you!…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CAFC Weekly: April 29, 2011 by Celia Anhalt</title>
		<link>http://www.obvipat.com/2011/04/cafc-weekly-april-29-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Celia Anhalt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 01:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obvipat.com/?p=1431#comment-981</guid>
		<description>I feel like I’m constantly looking for interesting things to read about a variety of topics, but I manage to include your site among my reads every day because you have honest entries that I look forward to.  Here’s hoping there’s a lot more amazing material coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like I’m constantly looking for interesting things to read about a variety of topics, but I manage to include your site among my reads every day because you have honest entries that I look forward to.  Here’s hoping there’s a lot more amazing material coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If at First You Don&#8217;t Succeed, Try Again: Lexmark and Refilling Cartridges by Orlando Lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.obvipat.com/2010/10/if-at-first-you-dont-succeed-try-again-lexmark-and-refilling-cartridges/comment-page-1/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Orlando Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obvipat.com/?p=1086#comment-950</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your remarks. We appreciate your readership and hope that we can continue to provide material of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your remarks. We appreciate your readership and hope that we can continue to provide material of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If at First You Don&#8217;t Succeed, Try Again: Lexmark and Refilling Cartridges by online selling</title>
		<link>http://www.obvipat.com/2010/10/if-at-first-you-dont-succeed-try-again-lexmark-and-refilling-cartridges/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>online selling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 00:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obvipat.com/?p=1086#comment-855</guid>
		<description>This post was without a doubt a quality read &amp; I enjoy not crappy articles on the internet being that alot is dupicate.  I recognize that in the area of site material it is for the most part King for the matter of getting a webpage ranked and what not (undoubtely the reason I found this).  I&#039;ve made a few sites back when and am working on an internet mini jobs marketplace kinda thing for people to logon and buy and sell services to one another.  That being said I have to pound away on getting some article content and what not on the webpage and so forth.  Anyway take care and continue getting out quality material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was without a doubt a quality read &amp; I enjoy not crappy articles on the internet being that alot is dupicate.  I recognize that in the area of site material it is for the most part King for the matter of getting a webpage ranked and what not (undoubtely the reason I found this).  I&#8217;ve made a few sites back when and am working on an internet mini jobs marketplace kinda thing for people to logon and buy and sell services to one another.  That being said I have to pound away on getting some article content and what not on the webpage and so forth.  Anyway take care and continue getting out quality material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CAFC Weekly: November 12, 2010 by Orlando Lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.obvipat.com/2010/11/cafc-weekly-november-12-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>Orlando Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obvipat.com/?p=1150#comment-798</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your kind words. We will continue to strive for useful reporting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your kind words. We will continue to strive for useful reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CAFC Weekly: November 12, 2010 by First Aid Lessons</title>
		<link>http://www.obvipat.com/2010/11/cafc-weekly-november-12-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>First Aid Lessons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 06:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obvipat.com/?p=1150#comment-745</guid>
		<description>I just sent this post to a bunch of my friends as I agree with most of what you’re saying here and the way you’ve presented it is awesome.:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just sent this post to a bunch of my friends as I agree with most of what you’re saying here and the way you’ve presented it is awesome.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CAFC Weekly: November 12, 2010 by John</title>
		<link>http://www.obvipat.com/2010/11/cafc-weekly-november-12-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obvipat.com/?p=1150#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Speaking of OCR, here is a good article which compares the various OCR software: http://ocrworld.com/software/5-in-depth/149-top-ocr-software.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of OCR, here is a good article which compares the various OCR software: <a href="http://ocrworld.com/software/5-in-depth/149-top-ocr-software.html" rel="nofollow">http://ocrworld.com/software/5-in-depth/149-top-ocr-software.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chocolate Wars by eater of bars</title>
		<link>http://www.obvipat.com/2010/05/chocolate-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>eater of bars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obvipat.com/?p=700#comment-143</guid>
		<description>The 12 bar pattern also has a function: it makes it easy to divide it in 2, 3 and 4 equal lots which is handy when sharing with friends and absolutely essential when dividing for children. Thus the design has utility.

The 12 and 24 piece pattern is quite common in my country, probably for these reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 12 bar pattern also has a function: it makes it easy to divide it in 2, 3 and 4 equal lots which is handy when sharing with friends and absolutely essential when dividing for children. Thus the design has utility.</p>
<p>The 12 and 24 piece pattern is quite common in my country, probably for these reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to obvIPat! by Anna DeLeo</title>
		<link>http://www.obvipat.com/2010/05/welcome-to-obvipat/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna DeLeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obvipat.com/?p=109#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jeff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jeff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

